Clinical Report: Tenecteplase Fails to Boost EVT Outcomes
Overview
The TNK-PLUS trial found that intravenous tenecteplase prior to endovascular treatment did not improve functional independence at 90 days compared to endovascular treatment alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Background
Acute ischemic stroke due to proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion presents significant treatment challenges. The use of thrombolytics like tenecteplase prior to endovascular treatment has been explored, but evidence supporting its efficacy remains inconclusive.
Data Highlights
| Group | Functional Independence (mRS 0-2) | Adjusted Relative Rate | Risk Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenecteplase | 44% | 1.01 (95% CI: 0.83-1.24) | 1% (95% CI: -9% to 11%) |
| Endovascular Treatment Alone | 43% |
Key Findings
- Functional independence at 90 days was 44% in the tenecteplase group versus 43% in the endovascular treatment alone group.
- The adjusted relative rate for functional independence was 1.01, indicating no significant difference between groups.
- Reperfusion prior to endovascular treatment occurred in 10% of patients receiving tenecteplase compared to 7% in the control group.
- Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours occurred in 5% of the tenecteplase group and 3% in the control group, with inconclusive safety data.
- Median time from symptom onset to randomization was approximately 10 hours, with a 90-minute door-to-needle time for tenecteplase.
- Subgroup analyses did not reveal significant treatment-effect heterogeneity across various demographics and clinical characteristics.
Clinical Implications
The findings from the TNK-PLUS trial indicate that administering tenecteplase prior to endovascular treatment does not confer additional benefits in achieving functional independence.
Conclusion
The TNK-PLUS trial indicates that tenecteplase does not improve outcomes when given before endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
Related Resources & Content
- JAMA, 2026 -- Intravenous Tenecteplase Prior to Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours: The TNK-PLUS Randomized Clinical Trial
- 2026 Guideline for the Early Management of Patients With AIS - Professional Heart Daily | American Heart Association
- European Stroke Organisation (ESO) expedited recommendation on tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke - PMC
- Frontiers in Neurology — Transition to tenecteplase is associated with shorter door-to-puncture times: a retrospective study from the Lone Star Stroke consortium TNK registry
- Frontiers in Neurology — Long-term outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy vs. medical care in patients with large ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- conexiant — Tirofiban After Tenecteplase in Stroke
- European Radiology — Economic Evaluation of CT Perfusion for Identifying Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Prior to Endovascular Intervention: A Model-Based Analysis
- Transition to tenecteplase is associated with shorter door-to-puncture times: a retrospective study from the Lone Star Stroke consortium TNK registry
- Long-term outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy vs. medical care in patients with large ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- 2026 Guideline for the Early Management of Patients With AIS - Professional Heart Daily | American Heart Association
- European Stroke Organisation (ESO) expedited recommendation on tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke - PMC
- Intravenous Tenecteplase Prior to Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours: The TNK-PLUS Randomized Clinical Trial | Trials | JAMA | JAMA Network
- Tenecteplase for Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours with Perfusion-Imaging Selection | New England Journal of Medicine
- Tenecteplase for Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours without Thrombectomy | New England Journal of Medicine
- BRIDGE-TNK: Tenecteplase Before Thrombectomy Improves Post Stroke Functional Outcomes - American College of Cardiology
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.