Clinical Report: Shared Decision-Making Is Institution-Driven

Overview

A national cohort study reveals that the implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) and patient decision aids in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion procedures is significantly influenced by the treating institution rather than patient characteristics. The findings highlight substantial variability in SDM documentation across institutions, raising concerns about adherence to policy requirements.

Background

Shared decision-making is critical in enhancing patient engagement and ensuring that treatment decisions align with patient values and preferences. Despite guidelines mandating SDM for procedures like percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion, significant disparities exist in its application across different healthcare institutions. Understanding these variations is essential for improving patient-centered care and compliance with reimbursement policies.

Data Highlights

Key Findings

• About two-thirds of encounters documented both SDM and a decision aid.
• Institutional factors accounted for the majority of differences in SDM reporting.
• Median odds of documented SDM varied significantly across institutions.
• Patient characteristics had a modest impact on SDM documentation.
• Medicare patients did not have higher odds of documented SDM despite reimbursement requirements.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare institutions must prioritize the implementation of standardized protocols for shared decision-making to ensure compliance with guidelines and improve patient outcomes. Training for clinicians on effective SDM practices is essential to bridge the gap between policy and real-world application.

Conclusion

The findings underscore the need for institutional investment in shared decision-making practices to enhance consistency and quality in patient care. Addressing these disparities is vital for aligning clinical practice with established guidelines.

References

1. BMC Psychiatry, Springer, 2025 -- Assessing decision-making capacity in clinical practice in Norway: a qualitative exploration of stakeholder perspectives
2. The ASCO Post -- SIDEBAR: Shared Decisions: What Should We Expect?
3. 2023 Guideline for Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Key Perspectives - American College of Cardiology
4. The ASCO Post — SIDEBAR: Shared Decisions: What Should We Expect?
5. ophthalmology management — Enhancing Practice Performance: Challenges of Problem Solving & Decision Making
6. Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy - American College of Cardiology
7. 2023 Guideline for Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Key Perspectives - American College of Cardiology