Clinical Scorecard: Shared Decision-Making Is Institution-Driven
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion |
| Key Mechanisms | Shared decision-making (SDM) and patient decision aids (DAs) |
| Target Population | Patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion |
| Care Setting | Cardiology institutions in the United States |
Key Highlights
- Two-thirds of procedures documented SDM and use of decision aids.
- Institutional factors significantly influence SDM reporting.
- Median odds of documented SDM vary over 100-fold between institutions.
- Patient characteristics have modest impact on SDM documentation.
- Medicare patients do not show higher odds of documented SDM despite reimbursement requirements.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Assess patient eligibility for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.
Management
- Implement shared decision-making processes and utilize patient decision aids.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Evaluate the quality of SDM documentation and patient understanding.
Risks
- Consider that SDM may sometimes serve more as compliance than true preference-sensitive deliberation.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion, particularly those at higher risk.
Higher-risk patients are more likely to have documented SDM, potentially reinforcing clinical recommendations.
Clinical Best Practices
- Invest in institutional practices to standardize SDM documentation.
- Establish clearer standards for evaluating SDM quality.
- Assess the effectiveness of decision aids in improving patient alignment with values.
References
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.