Objective:
To investigate the association between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, considering patients' serostatus.
Approach:
- Study Design: Data from 3,952 patients with prevalent RA and no established cardiovascular disease were analyzed, following them from enrollment until a first major adverse cardiovascular event, death, migration, or censoring.
- Outcome Measures: The primary outcome included nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death, with disease activity measured using the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP).
- Statistical Analysis: Adjusted analyses were performed to assess the relationship between baseline DAS28-CRP and the hazard of cardiovascular events, accounting for demographic and cardiovascular risk factors.
Key Findings:
- Each 1-unit increase in baseline DAS28-CRP was associated with an 18% higher hazard of a first major adverse cardiovascular event.
- 184 patients experienced a first major adverse cardiovascular event during 22,981 patient-years of follow-up.
- Higher DAS28-CRP scores were linked to cardiovascular events in patients negative for both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA), and those positive for both, while associations in the single-positive groups did not reach statistical significance.
Interpretation:
Combined serostatus may influence the relationship between inflammatory activity and cardiovascular outcomes in RA patients.
Limitations:
- Disease activity and cardiovascular risk factors were assessed only at enrollment, limiting the ability to account for changes over time.
- The study lacked detailed information on RF and ACPA titers, isotypes, and specificities.
- Cardiovascular events were not centrally adjudicated, and recruitment bias may have been introduced.
Conclusion:
Serostatus may modify the association between RA disease activity and cardiovascular risk.
Sources:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.