Objective:
To evaluate the impact of preoperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on revision rates and complications in patients with obesity undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Approach:
- Study Design: Retrospective analysis using the TriNetX electronic health record database to identify patients with obesity who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair prior to June 2023.
- Patient Matching: Patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists were propensity matched 1:1 with those who had never received the therapy, resulting in matched cohorts of 1,183 patients each.
- Outcome Evaluation: Evaluated medical complications and emergency department utilization at 90 days, as well as retear, revision surgery, and conversion-to-arthroplasty rates at 1 and 2 years post-surgery.
Key Findings:
- Lower revision rates for left-sided repairs in patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists: 2% at 1 year and 4% at 2 years compared to 7% and 8% in controls.
- No significant differences in revision rates for right-sided repairs.
- Lower retear rates among female patients undergoing left-sided repairs: 19% vs. 31% at 1 year and 20% vs. 34% at 2 years.
- No significant differences in retear rates in the overall cohort or among male patients and right-sided repairs.
- Short-term safety outcomes were similar between groups with no significant differences in complications.
Interpretation:
Limitations:
- Retrospective study design with reliance on administrative coding data, which may lead to inaccuracies.
- Lack of information on tear size, tissue quality, surgical technique, rehabilitation protocols, and imaging-confirmed healing.
- Observed benefits primarily limited to left-sided repairs, potentially reflecting coding limitations.
Conclusion:
Sources:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.