Objective:
To investigate the association between oral microbiome richness and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and other respiratory outcomes.
Approach:
- Study Design: Cross-sectional analysis of adults from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey across three centers.
- Participants: Gingival sampling performed on 355 participants, with metagenomic sequencing successful for 335 samples.
- Outcomes Measured: Respiratory outcomes included asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, sensitization status, spirometry, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide.
- Data Analysis: Adjusted analyses were conducted to assess associations between oral microbiome richness and respiratory outcomes.
Key Findings:
- Increasing oral microbiome richness was associated with chronic rhinosinusitis overall, with the strongest association among participants with nonallergic chronic rhinosinusitis.
- No consistent association was observed between alpha diversity and asthma, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, or fractional exhaled nitric oxide.
- Functional gene profiling revealed broader differences, with many unique genes present in participants without asthma or chronic rhinosinusitis.
Interpretation:
Increased richness of the oral microbiome is associated with a higher prevalence of nonallergic chronic rhinosinusitis.
Limitations:
- Cross-sectional design limits conclusions about causality.
- Cohort was enriched for participants with respiratory symptoms, not representative of the general population.
- Recent antibiotic-use data were unavailable.
- Asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis were based on questionnaire responses, potentially leading to misclassification.
Conclusion:
The study found an association between oral microbiome richness and chronic rhinosinusitis, particularly nonallergic types, while no consistent association with asthma was found.
Sources:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.