Objective:
To evaluate the likelihood of developing glaucoma-related diagnoses in adult patients with hypertension treated with systemic alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists compared to those treated with systemic beta-blockers.
Approach:
- Study Design: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study using de-identified electronic health records from the TriNetX Analytics Platform.
- Population: Patients aged 40 years or older with hypertension who received at least four prescriptions for systemic alpha-2 agonists or beta-blockers.
- Exclusions: Patients with preexisting ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma, concomitant exposure to the comparator drug, or inadequate ophthalmic follow-up were excluded.
- Analysis: Propensity score matching was performed, resulting in 4,152 patients in each treatment group. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted.
Key Findings:
- Systemic alpha-2 agonist use was associated with lower odds of ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma compared to beta-blocker use.
- At 3 years, primary open-angle glaucoma developed in 2% of alpha-2 agonist users versus 3% of beta-blocker users.
- At 5 years, the rates were 2% for alpha-2 agonists and 4% for beta-blockers for primary open-angle glaucoma.
- Ocular hypertension rates were similar initially but lower among alpha-2 agonist users at 5 years (2% vs. 4%).
Interpretation:
The findings indicate an association between systemic alpha-2 agonist use and reduced risks of glaucoma-related diagnoses.
Limitations:
- The observational nature of the study prevents establishing causality.
- Residual confounding and confounding by indication may exist despite adjustments.
- Lack of detailed ophthalmic measures such as intraocular pressure and visual field testing.
- Drug adherence could not be confirmed.
- Diagnoses were based on diagnostic codes, limiting generalizability beyond the US health care population.
Conclusion:
The association between systemic alpha-2 agonists and glaucoma risk warrants further investigation.
Sources:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.